For owners and teams spending too much time on research, planning and first drafts. We configure connected AI skills in Claude around your work. Less preparation leaves more attention for work that brings in revenue.
Start hereExplore the floors ↓Four separate packages. Start with the one you need.
Context comes in. The department prepares the material. Work comes out for your person to review.
For owners, agencies and marketing teams
Your offer, audience and examples of your brand voice.
A monthly plan, articles, posts, ad campaigns and visual briefs. The stages retain shared context and include checks along the way.
Material to check for facts, tone and offer before publishing.
Your marketing reviewerFor law firms and solo lawyers
Case documents and facts about the client.
A case file, chronology, legal analysis, case-law research, deadlines, contracts and filings. Citations are mechanically compared with official sources.
Drafts with checked citations for a lawyer to review, amend and sign.
The lawyer handling the caseFor owners and managers without legal training
A situation or a question about a proposed change in law.
An explanation of current law with precise citations and official links. It traces related provisions and how a proposed change could affect them.
A plain-language briefing with legal grounds for your designated person to review.
Your designated reviewerFor accountants, auditors and tax advisers
A tax case or a corporate action before filing.
One researches penalties, revenue-agency interpretations and similar appeals. The other checks incorporation, capital changes and registrations. Findings include official sources.
Prepared research for professional judgement before the next action.
Your accountant, auditor or adviserEvery floor ends with a reviewer on your team. A checked citation supports the review. Judgement on the case and the signature remain with a person.
Checks the content and publishes approved material.
Assesses the legal grounds, amends and signs.
Reviews the briefing and decides the next action.
Reviews the research and approves the next step.
We choose one recurring task and configure the department around it. Your team then practises the full sequence through to review.
In the analysis at the start, I discuss your recurring work with you, along with who does it and what they need at the end. That determines the department to use.
We configure the skills with the relevant context and materials. We agree which data may be used and who reviews the output.
We demonstrate the sequence with a relevant example. Your team practises preparation and review so they can repeat the work themselves.
A package of connected skills for a defined job in Claude, configured for your context. Each department prepares different material. The audit establishes which package fits your tasks.
No. A marketing team and a law firm have different work. Start with the package that addresses your particular need.
Your designated reviewer checks and approves the material. All law-firm outputs are drafts for a lawyer to review. A checked citation does not replace professional judgement on the case.
It depends on the tasks and review time. The audit looks at the preparation you do today. We do not promise a savings percentage or additional revenue without evidence from your work.
In the analysis at the start, you show me one recurring task. I assess which ready-made department fits and what it should hand over for review.
Start here